Howard County decides to extend the General Plan update development until after newly elected Councilmembers have taken office

Screenshot of the HoCo By Design website

In a letter to the Howard County Council from Howard County Executive Calvin Ball on November 17th: (note – you are going to want to read this all the way to the end – I highlighted the section of the letter I thought most important)

Dear Chairperson Walsh,

As you are aware, one of the most important executive functions held by any Administration is to oversee the development of a General Plan update at the appropriate time. Conducted roughly once every decade since 1960, the General Plan establishes clear, long-range policies for the County’s future growth and conservation. It considers how and where the County should grow as it adjusts to evolving economic, environmental, and social conditions over the next 20 years. The Plan informs many of Howard County’s subsequent decisions on land use, transportation, open space, agriculture, community facilities, community character, historic preservation, housing, economic development, and quality of life, and is updated approximately every ten years to reflect the values and address the needs of the County’s changing population.

The process of developing a General Plan update is a matter of great public interest, requiring significant bandwidth and attention from both our Administration and the County Council as critical policy issues are considered. As has been historically required with a task of this importance, we have been hard at work crafting the next update to the General Plan – HoCo By Design. We have extensively engaged our community in this shared process, distributing over 81,000 fliers, hosting 78 community meetings and leading 28 focus groups since the spring of 2020. Despite the challenges of performing community outreach through a pandemic, there has been a high level of public engagement to date, with over 8,400 comments received, over 2,400 attendees at virtual events and nearly 1,200 responses to surveys conducted over the past seventeen (17) months.

While there has been significant effort to develop the HoCo By Design draft Plan and substantial interest and engagement from our community, we have deep concerns about the County Council’s capacity to meaningfully engage in this critically important process while balancing competing priorities and duties over the next year. The last update to the General Plan, PlanHoward 2030, required the previous County Council to dedicate eight (8) Work Sessions over two months to deliberate on the Plan in a continuous and efficient manner. Given the overwhelming level of public engagement in this process to date, the current Council may need as many, or more, Work Sessions to give HoCo By Design sufficient consideration.

Our concerns were heightened by remarks made by many Councilmembers at the Council’s Monthly Meeting held on November 3, 2021. Council Chair Walsh remarked broadly about the current Council workload at 2:44:15 that “I just have real concerns about the pace and the volume that we take on and any pretense we are giving the attention it deserves, and that we are allowing the public the availability to give the attention that each of these bills deserve on the schedule that we have customarily agreed to.”

Councilmember Jung remarked at 2:54:44 that “We are going to need hearings on the General Plan, both from the public and time for the County Council to review the General Plan. I don’t know if we want to put something on the calendar for that, but all the more reason why we have to do something this coming year. There’s just no way that we can do Zoning Board, General Plan, redistricting, legislative sessions and everything else. We just don’t have the bandwidth to do all that.” Continuing at 2:58:37, Councilmember Jung stated that “We’ve had charter review, we’ve had a number of large items that we have had to address during our short time on the County Council and now we’ve got the General Plan. So there have been a lot of sort of, extra items that have created even more time constraints I think for all of us.”

Councilmember Yungmann added at 2:54:26 that “I’m not sure I’m an advocate for telling the Administration that they have an allowance or us not introducing things, but come on. You’re telling us you want us to get through the General Plan by a certain period of time, you need to hold back some of that stuff.”

Further complicating the ability to meaningfully engage in this highly impactful decision-making process are the presence of primary and general elections being held in June and November of next year, respectively. Prior County Councils have been concerned about the potential politicization of critical land-use and zoning policy decisions during an election cycle, evidenced by Howard County Code § 16.211, which prohibits the Council from taking final action on zoning applications between the date of the primary election and the point at which newly elected Councilmembers have qualified and taken office.

A General Plan update deserves thoughtful consideration by the County Council as noted by the concerns expressed at the November 3rd Monthly Meeting. We can all agree that it is not in the best interests of our County, our community, or this inclusive and deliberate process to submit this Plan to the Council for consideration when its members have concerns about the available bandwidth and attention needed to adequately vet the policies and objectives contained therein. It is far more important to us to get this General Plan right than it is to deliver it right now.

Given the importance of the policy considerations contained within a General Plan update, the limited bandwidth of the County Council to consider this legislation while balancing other critical and time sensitive duties, and acknowledgement that zoning recommendations in the General Plan should be held to the same standards as other zoning matters, we have decided to extend the Plan’s development until after newly elected Councilmembers have qualified and taken office as outlined in Howard County Code § 16.211. This decision will also allow us to use the coming months to incorporate the substantial community feedback received into the Plan, engage the public in additional in-person dialogue as COVID cases continue to decline after the holiday season and beyond, and refine draft policies to ensure they reflect our community’s interests.

As always, thank you for your continued partnership.

All my Best,

Calvin Ball Howard County Executive


  • Opel Jones, County Council Vice Chair
  • Deb Jung, County Councilmember
  • Christiana Mercer Rigby, County Councilmember
  • David Yungmann, County Councilmember have
  • Michelle Harrod, Council Administrator


You can see the PDF version of the letter here: 20211117 Letter to Council re HoCo By Design FINAL[23937]


For those curious about “Howard County Code § 16.211″:

Sec. 16.211. – Councilmanic election years.

In any year in which members of the County Council are elected, the incumbent Councilmembers, shall not take final action on any zoning application after the date of the primary election as set by law and until the newly elected County Councilmembers have qualified and taken office. The enactment of this section shall not in any way prevent the Zoning Board or the County Council from acting on zoning matters which are considered, in the discretion of the Council or the Board, to be emergency matters that could be injurious to the County or any of its citizens.


You can learn more about the General Plan update on the HoCo By Design website:

Note: I did not see this update on the website noted above but I am betting this action will cause a GREAT deal of discussion in the near future. Also, I have not yet seen anything on social media about this extension of the Plan’s development from the County Executive or Councilmembers. I will keep an eye out for future updates.

Scott E


  1. It is pretty obvious that the County Executive is trying to avoid a contentious approval process for the pro-growth revised General Plan. Handpicked/CE supported candidates are primarying Councilmembers Walsh and Jung who are the only voices for smart/slower growth and adequate public facility requirements. A rubber stamp Council is obviously the goal.


  2. There is a boatload of both old and new ideas being folded into the HoCo By Design process which is causing the effort to bog down, at least that’s how it appears from the outside looking in. I find common ground with Jim in recognizing there are influential parties with development agendas paying close attention to this policy-makers delight–after all, their livelihoods will feel the effects for years to come after the new plan is completed. While all stakeholders should have their voices heard as this new plan becomes official, growth for the sake of growth is *not* serving our collective interest. Personally, I’m a fan of investment in the community where it is building our resilience to the effects of oncoming climate change; that includes re-investing in the villages and gradually transforming them so they don’t become outdated nor fall further into decay. For those who must live life in the past, consider moving to old town EC, or head west out to Hagerstown or Cumberland–but for the vast majority of Howard Countians, pressures for development are not going away and need to be intelligently channeled.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s